10/14/2021
A message from our founder:
-----
Integrity.
It’s a word I think about often, in running a business. Revenue, profitability, sales, growth – much conversation around management focuses on these priorities. But seldom do leaders take a step back and talk about how to pursue these goals with integrity. And the truth is, that’s a lot harder. It can mean sleepless nights, figuring out how to do right by employees and clients alike; days spent considering what investments are both financially viable and ethically responsible; an occasional awkward conversation that results in turning down business that doesn’t meet company standards.
Last week, Facebook’s integrity was called into question, and it quickly became a conversational topic in one of our staff meetings. Our Managing Director posed the question: Should we continue to have a presence on Facebook, given the 60 Minutes report and whistleblower congressional testimony?
It’s a question worth considering carefully.
As the owner of a research agency conducting business in the media sector, I’ve found that Facebook’s actions regarding data and research have given me pause on several occasions. Can we trust a company that’s done mood experiments on users (under the guise of “engagement”) without opt-in and without actively screening out minors (2013)? That released PII to third parties without user permission and then failed to enforce the policies it set to mitigate that breach (2015-2018)? Or that’s become aware of its own algorithmic harm to civic stability and democracy and neglected to heed warnings to change those algorithms (present)? Do we want to be associated with that, as a company that cares deeply about data ethics?
Some people on our team reasonably question if Facebook is becoming an unethical lightning rod that we shouldn’t want any part of. Others recognize the practical irony that we can use Facebook itself to promote business ethics, data use ethics, and data governance ethics, and to call for sensible regulatory oversight that prevents ethical violations. Both are right. Whether we stay put and campaign for needed regulation or leave this platform and put our promotional efforts elsewhere, I’ll feel we’re acting with integrity. But I do feel that if we remain on Facebook, we have an obligation to speak up. So today, I’m doing just that.
At this stage, the digital media industry is aware of the potential harm caused by AI, the violations to data privacy and consumer trust, and the reality of algorithmic bias. But it hasn’t been successful at self-regulating. We are long overdue for reasonable and effective oversight of the tech and digital media industries at the federal level. Research Narrative has intentionally invested in data privacy research for several years to help with his effort, and we’re currently working with industry membership organizations and other companies in the insights space to inform federal data privacy regulation.
We believe companies such as Facebook (although certainly not limited to Facebook) cannot and should not be left to audit themselves in matters related to data integrity. Third parties and government agencies already audit (or even provide) TV and online measurement data, financial statements, and clinical trials; we believe the time has come for third party auditing of algorithms and oversight of consumer data as well.
We certainly don’t begrudge companies like Facebook their success in creating a successful and engaging platform that we ourselves enjoy using, but we do believe that with power comes responsibility and accountability to others. We will continue to champion reasonable and responsible federal oversight, in the hopes that we can build a better and safer digital media ecosystem. An ecosystem that is trustworthy in its stewardship of data and use of algorithms. An ecosystem with integrity.
Yours in trust,
Kerry