10/28/2024
We all get projects or requests from higher ups that have the potential to cause channel damage, financial harm, technical issues like debt, or employee dissatisfaction. The way you respond to these "bad ideas" is what determines whether you have a voice at the table or not.
It took me a long time not to react, but instead to take a deep breath and format a response that is both proactive while expressing the concerns about the project.
Over the years I unexpectedly created four templates that cover these responses based on four situations, and they work for good strategies, incredible ideas, and things that will bring the company to a new level.
In the post you'll find the four templates I use with my agency when faced with tricky situations and when I use them. I use these same templates for ideas I love, and before we try new things.
The situations include:
- When damage is likely minimal, but also unnecessary as there are alternatives
- Situations where your do not have the knowledge or solution yet, but have valid concerns and need them heard
- There are ways to implement while reducing risk to a minimum, or being able to recover if the worst happens and we proceed as is
- If the project will continue regardless of risk, and how to prepare with a proactive approach
When all you do is say no and fight off tests or new ideas, you lose your voice at the table. I don't know if these templates will work for your situations, but I hope they can help get you on a proactive and productive approach to tricky situations.
We all face inevitable situations that can lead to project failure and revenue loss. Here are four templates we use when addressing this.