24/05/2026
I respect Dave Ramsey. He's helped millions of people get out of debt and think more seriously about money.
But his home buying advice in 2026 deserves an honest look at the actual math.
Here's what his framework requires.
20% down. 15-year fixed rate mortgage. Monthly payment no more than 25% of take-home pay.
Sounds reasonable. Let's run it.
Take a married couple both earning $100,000 a year. $200,000 combined household income. Two six-figure salaries. By almost any measure this is a financially successful American family.
To buy a $700,000 home in a decent area in most major metros they'd need $140,000 in cash for the down payment. The current 15-year fixed rate per Freddie Mac is 5.65%.
At that rate the mortgage on the remaining $560,000 runs approximately $4,625 a month. Add property taxes, insurance, and a modest HOA and you're comfortably above $5,500 a month.
Their combined take-home after taxes is roughly $11,000 a month.
That's 50% of take-home pay going to housing. Dave's rule says 25%.
Okay let's drop to a $500,000 home. More modest. More reasonable. Same criteria.
15-year mortgage at 5.65% on $400,000 after 20% down runs about $3,300 a month in principal and interest. With taxes and insurance you're at roughly $4,200 a month.
That's still 38% of take-home pay.
Still doesn't pass the Ramsey test.
So what CAN this dual-income six-figure household actually afford under Dave's framework?
About $340,000.
The median home in America costs $418,000. A $340,000 home exists in a shrinking number of markets and almost none of them are where the jobs are.
The advice isn't wrong in theory. The 15-year mortgage builds equity faster. Avoiding PMI makes sense. Keeping housing costs under 25% of take-home is genuinely good financial hygiene.
The problem is the advice was built for a housing market that no longer exists.
👉🏼 Follow Jude Billy to learn wealth-building tips your parents and school didn’t teach you.