25/02/2019
Targeted sanctions are often effective strategies to achieve specific foreign policy objectives when diplomacy breaks down. But what are the human costs? In this issue of Political Economy, economist Dr. Naseraddin Alizadeh quantifies the adverse effects of the 2010-2015 comprehensive sanctions levied against Iran by the United States and Europe, finding that while the policy was effective in slowing the development of Iran's nuclear program, the primary victims were 'unprivileged outsiders' to the Iranian regime. Several indicators- such as democratic and human rights indices, income inequality, women and child mortality, asylum conditions, first and middle-income deciles’ welfare, healthcare quality, and the environment- were negatively impacted. This brings up the question: what level of collateral damage is acceptable from a game theoretical perspective when evaluating economic sanctions?
Read more on POLITICAL ECONOMY:
Dr. Naseraddin Alizadeh measures the adverse economic costs of the comprehensive sanctions against Iran, examining the game theoretical mechanisms of sanctions in general, and how unprivileged 'outsiders' in Iran became primary victims.