05/06/2026
Australia’s negative gearing debate is heating up, with One Nation proposing a cap that would allow investors to negatively gear a maximum of two properties.
The proposal comes as an alternative to the Albanese Government’s housing tax reforms, which aim to significantly reduce negative gearing benefits for existing properties while maintaining incentives for new housing developments.
Under One Nation's proposal:
🏠 Investors could negatively gear up to two properties
🏠 Existing tax benefits would remain available for everyday investors
🏠 The policy would reject broader restrictions proposed by Labor
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson argues that Australia’s housing affordability crisis should be addressed through:
• Increasing housing supply
• Reducing migration pressures
• Restricting foreign property ownership
The proposal enters a growing political debate, with different parties offering competing solutions to tackle housing affordability and rental shortages.
As the legislation moves through Parliament, minor parties may play a crucial role in determining the final outcome.
Do you think negative gearing should be:
🔹 Unlimited
🔹 Limited to a small number of properties
🔹 Removed entirely?
👇 Let us know your view.