10/10/2026
Under the JORC Code (2012), public reporting of exploration results is expected to include drill hole information such as collar location, elevation, dip, azimuth, hole length and intercept depths, along with appropriate maps and sections. When those results reach ASX announcements and investor presentations, the visuals that accompany them should match that data exactly.
Small errors add up quickly. A one-degree error in dip over a 500-metre hole moves the end of that hole by almost nine metres. In a section view, that can shift where an intercept appears relative to the orebody, and change how investors read the result.
That’s why at Vast Visual, we don’t estimate missing values. When project data has a gap, we raise it with the client’s geology team, confirm the figures, and build from verified data only. Every trace, intercept and section is checked back against the source.
It’s a slower process in places. It’s also the only one we’re comfortable putting our name to.
How does your team make sure project visuals stay consistent with what’s been reported?