21/09/2026
On the surface, it sounds obvious. Of course AI beats stupidity. It can process more, remember more, generate more, optimise more. Very impressive. Gold star for the haunted calculator. ⭐️
But I’m not sure stupidity is really a data problem.
Real stupidity isn’t just not knowing something. It’s knowing exactly enough to be dangerous. It’s confidence without thought. Speed without wisdom. Progress without asking who it serves. It’s building systems nobody fully understands, then acting surprised when they behave like systems nobody fully understands.
Which is where the small print comes in.
AI might beat human stupidity in a straight fight, but only if we don’t give stupidity the login details, a venture capital round, and permission to update the terms whenever it likes.
That felt like a reasonable thing to put on an old computer.
Mainly because old computers, for all their flaws, were at least honest about being stupid. They crashed loudly, froze visibly, and asked you to insert Disk 2 with a kind of tragic sincerity.
Modern technology tends to smile while making the problem scalable.
AI may beat real stupidity, but only if real stupidity isn’t the one deploying it. 💾
•
•
•