21/01/2026
You can build a Movement for Years and Still Lose the Name Overnight
That’s the shock many people woke up to.
For a long time, VeryDarkMan (VDM) has used the name “Ratel” to describe his online movement and die-hard supporters. The name grew popularity, recognition, and influence but it remained only a name in use, not a name protected by law.
Then suddenly, Blord, an Igbo businessman VDM had previously clashed with online, announced the launch of an app called Ratel a full business platform for buying gift cards at affordable rates, funded through crypto or naira. At that moment, many people were confused. Some were angry. Some said it was unfair but the law was not confused at all.
Using a name loudly does not give you ownership.
Registering a name quietly can. All the years a name is trending online mean nothing if it was never registered or trademarked. Popularity does not equal legal control.
Now, some people argued:
“But ratel is an animal. You can’t trademark an animal name.”
That argument is wrong.
In law, animal names can be trademarked once they are used in a distinctive way for goods or services. What matters is not whether the word exists in nature, but whether it identifies a brand in commerce.
That is how:
🥢 Apple exists as a fruit and a brand
🥢 Jaguar exists as an animal and a brand
🥢 Puma exists as an animal and a brand
So yes, Ratel can be trademarked and someone who took the legal step first now holds the advantage.
Here is the implication many people are ignoring.
If VDM continues to use “Ratel” commercially or in a way that conflicts with a registered brand in the same space, the issue is no longer about online banter or loyalty. It becomes about brand rights.
The law does not ask:
“Who used it first on social media?”
It asks:
“Who protected it properly?”
This is the lesson nobody likes to hear.
You can build influence.
You can build followers.
You can build culture.
But if you don’t secure the name, someone else can turn it into bus