07/01/2026
Law, Not Noise: Why Only the Male Line Can Produce the Next Awujale of Ijebuland
By Olayinka Ogunade~
By any objective standard, the current debate over eligibility for the throne of the Awujale of Ijebuland should not exist. The law is clear. The declaration is explicit. Yet misinformation, selective reading of statutes, and what can only be described as legal adventurism have combined to muddy settled custom and settled law.
Let us, therefore, set the record straight...
At the centre of this controversy is the Chiefs Law and the Customary Law Declaration regulating the selection to the Awujale of Ijebuland chieftaincy, a declaration validly made under Section 4(2) of the Chiefs Law of 1957 and reaffirmed by the Ogun State Chieftaincy Law of 2021. Contrary to popular claims, the 2021 law did not alter the declaration. It reinforced it.
Those insisting otherwise are either mistaken or deliberately misleading the public.
What the Declaration Clearly Says
The declaration governing the Awujale stool in Ijebu-Ode establishes five fundamental points.
First, there are four recognised ruling houses:
Gbelegbuwa
Fusengbuwa
Anikinaiya
Fidipote
Second, the order of rotation is fixed and unambiguous:
1. Anikinaiya
2. Fusengbuwa
3. Fidipote
4. Gbelegbuwa
No committee, court of public opinion, or self-help interpretation can amend this order.
Third, and this is the heart of the matter, the declaration is categorical on eligibility.
Only members of the ruling house and of the male line may be proposed as candidates.
The declaration allows recourse to the female line only as an exception, not a right, and only where there is no male to succeed in that family. Even then, strict conditions apply: the mother must be an 'Abidagba', a true-born child delivered while the father was on the throne or, failing that, another narrowly defined category.
This is not ambiguous language. It is deliberate, restrictive, and clear.
To put it plainly:
Female-line succession is a last resort.