What are the opening hours?

Monday 08:00 - 18:30 Tuesday 08:00 - 18:30 Wednesday 08:00 - 18:30 Thursday 08:00 - 18:30 Friday 08:00 - 18:30

Ad Guys & Co by Ulysses Wang

Name: Ad Guys & Co by Ulysses Wang
Address: 8 Kaki Bukit Avenue 4, #04-26, Premier @ Kaki Buki, Singapore, 415875, SG
Telephone: +6593620959
Rating: 5

Home
Singapore
Singapore
Ad Guys & Co by Ulysses Wang

⭐️ Human Behaviours Authority meets Digital Superpower💥
SEO & Google Ads Agency in Singapore 🇸🇬 and NLP Training Worldwide 🌏
(357)

Meet Ulysses Wang, Founder and CEO of AD GUYS & CO, a digital marketing and SEO agency in Singapore. Human Behavioural Expert, Global Top 30 Gurus In NLP:

Ulysses went from almost losing it all in 2014 due to the global oil crisis, to becoming the global authority in human behaviour today. He has personally trained and coached more than 10,000+ students from 30+ different nationalities in Neuro-L

inguistic Programming (NLP), marketing, sales, negotiation and consumer behaviour. Ulysses is ranked among the Global Top 30 Gurus in NLP. He is well known for using his deep knowledge in human behaviours to combine with digital marketing trends to help his customers win in the marketplace. His favourite business quote:

“In order to win the business game in today’s context, a business owner must master the game of influence. And there is no better way than to deep dive into human behaviour. Tactics and strategies change every time. But human behaviour, how one will behave and react… will always remain the same.” – Ulysses Wang

AD GUYS & CO is a full service digital marketing and SEO agency based in Singapore, with clients and participants from 30+ countries worldwide. We help B2C businesses to BE ON GOOGLE PAGE 1, INCREASE VISIBILITY and ATTRACT A TON OF CUSTOMERS. We achieve this primarily through our 1) Guaranteed Google Page 1 SEO Campaigns, 2) Online Sales Campaign Digital Marketing Software, and 3) Marketing & Consumer Psychology Training.

15/08/2026

A charity once tested two approaches.
ㅤ
Ask directly for a $50 donation, low response.
Ask people to first sign a small petition, then ask for the donation days later, response nearly doubled.
ㅤ
Nothing about the cause changed. 📋
ㅤ
This is commitment and consistency, and it's one of the most quietly powerful forces in how people say yes to bigger things over time.
ㅤ
Once someone takes a small action aligned with an identity, "I'm someone who supports this cause", their brain works hard afterward to stay consistent with that self image, even when a bigger ask shows up later. 🧠
ㅤ
Here's why this works so reliably.
ㅤ
Humans have a deep discomfort with feeling inconsistent with themselves.
ㅤ
Once you've signed something, agreed to something small, or even just said "Yes, that makes sense" out loud, backing away from a related, bigger request later starts to feel like contradicting your own recent behaviour, not just declining an offer. 🎯
ㅤ
This shows up constantly in sales and marketing, often invisibly.
ㅤ
A free download isn't just lead generation, it's a small yes that makes the next, bigger yes feel consistent rather than sudden.
A short quiz before a sales page isn't just engagement, it's a series of small agreements that make the final offer feel like a natural continuation, not a cold ask out of nowhere.
ㅤ
The mistake many businesses make is jumping straight to the big ask, skipping the small yes entirely, then wondering why conversion feels like an uphill push.
ㅤ
A cold, large request has nothing prior to feel consistent with.
A large request following several small, genuine agreements feels like the obvious next step, because the person already started walking in that direction themselves. ✨
ㅤ
This only works honestly when each small yes is genuinely meaningful, not a manipulative trick question designed purely to extract agreement.
ㅤ
Real commitment consistency, not artificial pressure, is what carries someone forward naturally. 💡
ㅤ
Before your next big ask, consider what small, genuine yes could come first, one that quietly aligns someone with the identity your bigger offer is asking them to fully step into.
ㅤ

13/08/2026

A prospect once told me he wanted "Better Marketing". Twenty minutes of conversation later, what he actually wanted was to stop feeling embarrassed when friends asked how business was going. Same project. Completely different brief. 🎯
ㅤ
In NLP, this is the difference between a stated want and the value sitting underneath it, and there's one deceptively simple question that reveals it: "what would having that do for you?" 🧠
ㅤ
Ask it once, and "Better Marketing" becomes "More Consistent Enquiries".
Ask again, gently, and it becomes "Not worrying about payroll every month".
Ask once more, and you often land on something like "Feeling like the business is finally working".
That last answer is the real driver. Everything above it was just the vehicle.
ㅤ
Here's why this matters commercially.
ㅤ
People don't actually buy the surface request. They buy movement toward the deeper value, and if your proposal, pitch, or copy speaks only to the surface, it competes on features and price with everyone else offering the same surface.
ㅤ
Speak to the value underneath, and suddenly you're the only one in the conversation who seems to understand what's actually at stake. ✨
ㅤ
This works in leadership and coaching too.
ㅤ
A team member asking for a title change might, two questions deeper, actually be asking for recognition, or security, or evidence they're respected.
Grant the title without touching the value underneath, and the dissatisfaction returns within months, wearing a new request as a disguise.
ㅤ
The skill isn't interrogating people.
ㅤ
It's staying curious one or two questions longer than most conversations bother to go, and listening for the moment the answer shifts from logistics to feelings. That shift is the sound of the real motivation arriving. 💡
ㅤ
Most conversations stop at the first answer. Most of the value is sitting underneath the third one.
ㅤ
Next time someone tells you what they want, try asking, warmly, "And what would that do for you?"
Then ask it again. Notice how different the real conversation becomes. 🔍
ㅤ

11/08/2026

Two competitors once ranked side by side, positions three and four, for the same competitive keyword. One got triple the clicks of the other. Same ranking. Same search volume. Completely different outcome. 🔍
ㅤ
This gets ignored constantly because SEO conversations obsess over ranking position, as if position alone determines traffic.
It doesn't.
ㅤ
Between the ranking and the click sits one small, overlooked piece of real estate, the meta description, and most businesses write it like an afterthought instead of what it actually is, a tiny sales pitch competing for attention in a crowded results page. 🧠
ㅤ
Here's the psychology at play.
ㅤ
A searcher scanning results isn't reading carefully, they're scanning quickly for one signal,
"Does this result understand exactly what I'm looking for, right now, in this specific moment?"
ㅤ
Rank tells them nothing about that. The meta description is the only piece of text that can answer it directly, before a single click happens. 🎯
ㅤ
Most meta descriptions fail because they describe the business, "We are a leading provider of," instead of answering the searcher's actual question,
"How late are you open"
"Do you fix this specific issue"
"Is this covered under warranty"
ㅤ
One approach talks about you. The other speaks directly to what the searcher typed and worried about seconds earlier.
ㅤ
There's also a subtle trust signal hiding here.
ㅤ
A meta description that mirrors the exact phrasing or concern behind the search feels instantly more relevant than one that sounds like generic company copy, even if both link to equally good pages.
ㅤ
Google doesn't just judge relevance by ranking. It increasingly rewards higher click through rates too, treating them as evidence the page is genuinely valuable to real searchers. ✨
ㅤ
So ranking well isn't the finish line, it's the audition. The meta description is where you either earn the click or lose it to the mediocre result sitting one line above or below yours. 💡
ㅤ
Before your next content update, rewrite your meta descriptions to answer the searcher's actual worry, not to describe your business.
ㅤ
Small text box, disproportionate effect on whether anyone actually arrives.
ㅤ

09/08/2026

A business owner once told me his goal was "I want more clients."
Six months later, nothing had changed.
ㅤ
Not because he lacked drive, the goal itself was never specific enough to act on. 🎯
ㅤ
In NLP this relates to well formed outcomes, a structure for goals that your brain can actually process, as opposed to vague wishes that sound like goals but function more like wishful thinking dressed up in business language. 🧠
ㅤ
Here's the problem with "I want more clients".
ㅤ
It's stated in the negative direction of what you're avoiding, fewer clients, rather than what you're moving toward, and it has no sensory specific finish line.
How many clients, doing what, by when, and how would you actually know, concretely, the moment it happened?
Without those details, your brain has nothing solid to aim at, so it just... doesn't. ✨
ㅤ
A well formed outcome fixes this by answering a few specific questions.
ㅤ
Stated positively, "I want twelve new retainer clients" rather than "I don't want to struggle for clients anymore".
Sensory specific, "I'll know this happened when my calendar shows twelve active retainer contracts by March".
ㅤ
Within your control, focused on your own actions rather than depending entirely on someone else's behaviour. And connected to a bigger why, so the goal has genuine pull, not just obligation.
ㅤ
This isn't just wordplay. Vague goals create vague action, because there's nothing concrete for your brain to check progress against.
ㅤ
"I want more clients" gives you no way to notice if this week moved you closer or further away.
"Twelve retainer clients by March, evidenced by signed contracts" gives you a clear yes or no, every single week. 🔍
ㅤ
Try rewriting one current goal using this structure. State it positively, make it sensory specific, keep it within your control, and connect it to why it actually matters to you.
ㅤ
Notice how much more actionable it suddenly feels, without changing the ambition behind it at all. 💡

Most people don't have a motivation problem. They have a goal that was never specific enough for their own brain to actually pursue.
ㅤ

07/08/2026

A software company once watched churn drop the moment they extended their free trial from seven days to thirty.
ㅤ
Same product, same features, same price at the end. Cancellations dropped anyway. 📉
ㅤ
This is the endowment effect, and it's one of the strangest quirks in consumer psychology.
ㅤ
The moment something feels like it's already yours, even temporarily, even before you've paid a cent, your brain starts valuing it more than it did the moment before you had it. 🧠
ㅤ
Here's the strange part.
ㅤ
Losing something you already have feels far worse than never gaining it in the first place, even when the object itself hasn't changed at all.
ㅤ
A thirty day trial doesn't just give someone more time to evaluate a product. It gives their brain more time to start treating it as already theirs, and cancelling starts to feel like losing something, not simply declining to buy something. 🎯
ㅤ
This shows up everywhere once you notice it. Someone who's used a tool daily for three weeks doesn't cancel by asking "is this worth the price." They cancel while feeling like they're giving something up, and that feeling alone keeps a surprising number of people paying, even ones who'd never have chosen to buy it cold. ✨
ㅤ
This is why "Try it free" consistently outperforms "Here's a discount," even when the discount is worth more in raw dollars.
A discount saves money on something you don't have yet.
A trial hands you the object first, then lets your own attachment do the persuading, quietly, without a single sales message required.
ㅤ
The ethical version of this isn't tricking people into ownership they didn't want. It's genuinely useful products, given enough real time in someone's hands to reveal their actual value, letting the endowment effect reflect something true rather than manufacture something false. 💡
ㅤ
If your offer currently leads with a discount, consider testing a longer, genuine trial instead.
ㅤ
Sometimes the fastest way to a yes isn't lowering the price. It's letting someone hold the thing first.
ㅤ

05/08/2026

A salesperson once closed a deal by saying "Once you start using this, you'll notice the difference within the first week."
No pitch, no push, no "Would you like to buy."
Just one sentence, quietly doing all the work. 🎯
ㅤ
That sentence contains something called a presupposition, a language pattern that assumes something is already true, without ever stating it directly.
ㅤ
Notice it doesn't ask "Will you buy this."
It assumes buying has already happened, and simply describes what comes next.
ㅤ
This matters because human brains process assumptions differently than they process direct claims.
ㅤ
A direct claim invites scrutiny, "Is this actually true, should I believe this".
ㅤ
A presupposition slides underneath that scrutiny entirely, because there's nothing obvious to argue with. Nobody objects to "Once you start," they're too busy imagining the week that follows. 🧠
ㅤ
You'll hear this everywhere once you know what to listen for.
ㅤ
"Before you decide which package works best" presupposes a decision is coming, just not which one.
"When you notice the results" presupposes results will happen, skipping straight past "Will this even work."
ㅤ
None of this is manipulation through lying. It's simply shifting attention forward, past the doubt, toward the outcome. ✨
ㅤ
This is also why weak sales language often fails.
ㅤ
"This might help you" invites the brain to evaluate "might" and doubt gets an opening.
"When this starts helping you" gives doubt nowhere obvious to land, because the sentence structure already moved past that question. 💡
ㅤ
You can use this ethically in your own writing by noticing where you're currently asking permission, versus where you could simply describe what happens next.
ㅤ
"If you decide to work with us" versus "Once we start working together."
Small shift in structure, real shift in how certain it sounds.
ㅤ
Listen to your own last few sales messages. How many of them are quietly asking for permission, when a 𝙨𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙛𝙩 in structure could sound like it's already decided? 🔍
ㅤ
̇ng

03/08/2026

A client once messaged me confused. "Our top ad had crushed it for six weeks, then just died overnight, nothing changed on our end." Something had changed, just not on their end. 📉
ㅤ
This is ad fatigue, and it's often misdiagnosed as a targeting problem or a budget problem, when it's actually a psychological problem, specifically, habituation.
ㅤ
The first time someone sees your ad, their brain registers it as new information worth a glance. The tenth time, that same brain has already filed it as "seen this, nothing new here," and starts scrolling past it without conscious thought. 🧠
ㅤ
Here's what makes this tricky. The ad itself hasn't changed. The audience's relationship to it has.
ㅤ
Novelty is doing far more work in ad performance than most advertisers give it credit for, and novelty has a shelf life that has nothing to do with how good the ad actually is. 🎯
ㅤ
This explains a pattern many advertisers notice but rarely name correctly.
ㅤ
A strong ad often performs brilliantly, then declines, not because the offer weakened, but because the same eyes have now seen it enough times that their brain stopped paying attention on purpose. Frequency, once useful for building recognition, eventually starts working against you instead.
ㅤ
The fix isn't panicking and killing the offer. It's refreshing the wrapper around it, new visuals, a different angle on the same core message, a new opening line, while letting the underlying offer stay exactly as effective as it was. Your audience isn't tired of what you're offering. They're tired of recognising it instantly and no longer looking twice. ✨
ㅤ
This is also why constantly rotating fresh creative outperforms one "perfect" ad running indefinitely, even when that one ad initially outperformed everything else you tried.
ㅤ
Perfection has a habituation curve too, it just takes slightly longer to hit. 💡
ㅤ
Before assuming your offer stopped working, check how many times the same audience has already seen it. Sometimes the fix isn't a new strategy. It's just a 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 that was never actually broken.
ㅤ

01/08/2026

There was a stretch, a few years back, where running an NLP training business and a digital marketing agency at the same time felt less like synergy and more like living two separate lives badly. 😅
ㅤ
Clients from one side would ask "So are you a marketer or a trainer?" expecting a single answer.
I never had one. I kept quietly wondering if I should just pick a lane and let the other one go. 🤔
ㅤ
What almost pushed me to shut one down wasn't lack of demand. Both were growing.
It was the exhaustion of explaining myself twice, in two different vocabularies, to two different audiences, every single week. 😮‍💨
ㅤ
The shift happened by accident, in a workshop, not a strategy meeting.
ㅤ
I was teaching a room of salespeople about objection handling, purely NLP content, and halfway through, someone asked "How does this apply to ad copy?"
I answered without thinking, and the room lit up more than it had all session. 💡
ㅤ
That was the moment the two businesses stopped feeling separate. Not because I found clever branding to tie them together, but because I noticed they'd never actually been separate to begin with.
ㅤ
Marketing is applied psychology. Selling is applied psychology. Landing pages, ad copy, positioning, all of it runs on the exact same human wiring I'd been teaching in training rooms for years. 🧠
ㅤ
I stopped trying to explain myself twice.
I started explaining myself once, as someone who teaches how people think, and happens to apply that same understanding to growing businesses through marketing.
One sentence instead of two vocabularies. ✨
ㅤ
Looking back, the businesses were never competing for my attention. My explanation of them was just lagging behind what I'd already been doing naturally the whole time. 🎯
ㅤ
If you run more than one thing and feel like you're constantly translating yourself between them, the fix might not be picking one. It might be finding the one true sentence underneath both. 🔥
ㅤ

30/07/2026

A jam tasting study once tested this directly.
Offer people 24 flavours, plenty stop to taste.
Offer them 6 flavours, fewer people stop.
But sales told a different story entirely. 🍯
ㅤ
The 6 flavour table sold nearly ten times more jam than the 24 flavour table.
More choice attracted attention. Fewer choices actually closed sales.
ㅤ
This is choice overload, and it explains a quiet, expensive mistake many businesses make without realising it.
ㅤ
More options feels generous, feels like flexibility, feels like "We have something for everyone".
ㅤ
But human decision making doesn't scale that way.
Past a certain point, more options doesn't create more satisfaction, it creates more anxiety about choosing wrong. 🧠
ㅤ
Here's what happens psychologically.
ㅤ
Every extra option adds another comparison your brain has to run before committing. Six options require six mental comparisons. Twenty four options require dramatically more, and somewhere in that pile up, many people simply give up deciding altogether, not because nothing appealed to them, but because deciding itself became the harder task. 🎯
ㅤ
This shows up constantly in business.
ㅤ
A service menu with twelve packages, hoping to cover every possible client need, ends up making prospects unsure which one actually applies to them.
ㅤ
A simplified menu with three clear packages, each solving an obviously different problem, makes the decision almost automatic by comparison.
ㅤ
The instinct to add more options usually comes from a good place, wanting to serve more people, wanting to avoid turning anyone away. But past a certain point, more options doesn't serve more people. It just makes fewer of them able to decide at all. ✨
ㅤ
If a product, service, or pricing page of yours currently offers many similar sounding options, try the opposite experiment.
ㅤ
Cut it down to three, each solving a clearly different problem, and watch what happens to how quickly people actually choose. 💡
ㅤ
Choice 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 freedom. Past a certain point, it becomes friction wearing a generous disguise.
ㅤ

28/07/2026

A manager once asked me "How do I get my team to stop panicking every time something goes wrong?" My answer surprised her. "Stop panicking first." 😅
ㅤ
Most leadership training focuses on decisions, strategy, delegation, communication skills. All useful.
ㅤ
But there's a quieter skill underneath all of it that rarely gets named directly: 𝐄𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭.
ㅤ
Here's what actually happens inside a team.
ㅤ
States are contagious. If a leader walks into a crisis meeting tense, scattered, and visibly stressed, the room absorbs that energy within seconds, often before a single word is spoken. 😰
ㅤ
People don't just listen to what you say, they read your nervous system, and they calibrate their own reactions to match it, whether you intended that or not.
ㅤ
This is why calm leaders create calm teams, and anxious leaders create anxious teams, almost regardless of what's actually happening operationally. The problem itself might be identical.
ㅤ
In NLP terms, this is state induction, and it's happening constantly, whether you're managing it consciously or not. 🔄
ㅤ
The good news is, it works both directions. A leader who deliberately settles their own state before walking into a tense conversation, through breathing, posture, or simply slowing down their speech, tends to bring the room down with them. ✨
ㅤ
This doesn't mean suppressing urgency when urgency is genuinely needed.
It means separating "this situation is serious" 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 "I need to broadcast panic to prove I understand how serious it is."
ㅤ
Those are two very different signals, and teams respond very differently to each one. 🎯
ㅤ
Before your next difficult meeting, try this.
ㅤ
Spend sixty seconds beforehand consciously settling your own state, slower breath, relaxed shoulders, one grounding thought. Then walk in. 🚪
ㅤ
Watch how differently the room responds, not because the problem changed, but because you did. 💡
ㅤ
Leadership isn't about having every answer. It's about being 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐭, 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 in the room when nobody else can afford to be.
ㅤ

Address

8 Kaki Bukit Avenue 4, #04-26, Premier @ Kaki Buki
Singapore
415875

Opening Hours

Monday	08:00 - 18:30
Tuesday	08:00 - 18:30
Wednesday	08:00 - 18:30
Thursday	08:00 - 18:30
Friday	08:00 - 18:30

Telephone

+6593620959

Website

https://adguysco.com/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ad Guys & Co by Ulysses Wang posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Ad Guys & Co by Ulysses Wang:

Want your business to be the top-listed Advertising & Marketing Company in Singapore?