17/03/2026
The biggest challenge I face in advocating the adoption of brand-compliant logos is dealing with Asian bosses who refuse to understand how a logo should be. While most global companies are racing to get their logo as simple and memorable (some even paying millions to get a minimally-designed looking logo), the typical Asian bosses are paying much for a logo that in their mind, means the more complicated it looks, the more colourful it looks and the more elements (crowded) it has, the better the logo is and the higher its value.
That is completely wrong. There are countless examples (Shell, Microsoft, Pepsi, Mastercard, etc etc) where over the years, the companies keep investing in rebranding exercises because their logo is in trend (ie not simple enough). So why should we go against the grain and do the exact opposite? The reason is ignorance about how a logo is supposed to work... in the minds of customers.
Take a look at Pepsi logo evolution over the years. Compare what it is today with some of its older versions, and you will get the drift. So, take a look at your own logo and reassess its status. Is it brand-compliant, or does it exist merely to serve your fancy as the brand owner?
Take note, a logo, when correctly used, can be monetised as principal goodwill. So the longer you retain a 'wrong' logo, the more it will cost you when you decide to correct it in the future. I give a free assessment on brand identity. You can have my opinion on yours and thereafter decide for yourself. Its your own good or bad investment anyway.