05/27/2026
Should sellers pay buyer agent compensation?
Short answer?
YES!!!!
Read for more:
There are always exceptions, but fundamentally, it is basic math. If seller agrees to pay, the buyer can afford more home.
For $100k of home, a BAC might run 3% or $3k. If the buyer is required to come up with 10% down payment, a $100k home would require $10k in cash from the buyer to qualify for the $90k mortgage. So if they don't have $13,000, they can't afford the $100,000 mortgage.
That buyer with $10k in savings would barely make it, but could potentially qualify IF the seller agrees to pay the buyer agent compensation.
If you force them to compensate their own agent, they will likely have to have $3k to give them, leaving them with $7k in savings. That means they could only qualify for a $70k purchase and $63k mortgage. Reality is that it would meet somewhere in between, but...
Sellers are literally shrinking their pool of potential buyers if they are unwilling to allow the BAC to come from their side of the transaction.
Basic economics says that if you are trying to maximize the price of the product you are selling, you want to maximize demand. You don’t do that by eliminating potential buyers because you don’t understand math.
These numbers can fluctuate based on loan programs and other variables, but the point is the same. In this example, even if there is no other home available and the buyer is the same, the seller would end up getting a net $67,900 after paying their own agent 3%, rather than $94,000 if they were willing to compensate both 3%.
It makes a massive difference and educating our clients is a fiduciary responsibility in order to protect them.
The conversations are free. Don't sign an agreement until you are working with an agent that can explain the "why" of things in a way you understand.
Contact me!!!
Agency Iowa
515-214-8586/910-391-4554
[email protected]
Licensed to buy/sell real estate in Iowa