Young With Solutions, 2918 Avenue I, Unit #5212, Brooklyn, NY (2026)

09/04/2026

$94,969.04 in affiliate GMV. 4,142,020 video views. 479 videos posted. 30 days. 💸

This is what a fully operational affiliate program looks like at scale. 🚀

99,789 DMs sent. 91,376 creator invites. 3,595 sample requests. 155 samples approved. The outreach machine was running at full capacity — and the numbers show exactly what that produces.

Every $101.70 in GMV traced back to a single video. 479 creators posting. 2.44 videos per creator on average. Content compounding daily across the entire month.

👉 Here's what most brands miss about affiliate at this scale.

It's not just a revenue channel. It's a content engine. 4.1 million video views generated without a single dollar of paid media behind them. Creators posting because the product fits their audience — not because they were forced to.

Sample requests up 161.07%. DMs up 158.76%. Creator invites up 136.64%. The pipeline feeding this program is growing faster than the GMV itself — which means next month's numbers are already being built right now.

$94,969 in affiliate revenue is strong. But the real story is the system behind it. 💪

Outreach. Samples. Content. Views. Revenue. Repeat.

That's how affiliate compounds into something that runs itself. 🎯

09/01/2026

TikTok has the lowest cut rate of any platform on this chart. Only 6% of marketers are pulling back. 57% are increasing spend. 🧐

9,210 marketers told us exactly where social ad budgets are moving in 2026. The winners and losers are obvious 👇

⬆ Increasing spend:
- TikTok — 57% increasing, only 6% cutting
- X — 62% increasing, only 6% cutting
- YouTube — 53% increasing, 19% cutting
- Snap — 46% increasing, 17% cutting
- Instagram — 46% increasing, 19% cutting

⬇ Losing confidence:
- Facebook — only 18% increasing, 36% cutting
- LinkedIn — 37% increasing, 28% cutting
- Pinterest — 20% increasing, 21% cutting

Facebook is the sharpest signal. More marketers are cutting it than any other platform on this list. 36% pulling back. Only 18% adding more.

The platforms gaining budget share all have one thing in common — clear, measurable ROI and momentum with younger buying audiences. The ones losing it are legacy networks that haven't proven incremental impact at the rates marketers need.

This isn't brands abandoning social ads. It's brands getting more precise about where those ads actually work. 💯

Social ad spend is polarizing fast. The platforms that can prove the return are winning the budget. The ones that can't are becoming line items that get questioned every quarter.

Know where your money compounds. Cut where it doesn't. 🎯

08/31/2026

Same brand. Four days apart. Completely different business. 📈

👇 Here's what changed.

Apr 17 to 23:
£4,412.59 GMV. 472 orders. 469 customers. 538 items sold.

Apr 24 to 27:
£5,727.44 GMV. 689 orders. 686 customers. 764 items sold.

GMV up 91.12%. Orders up 100.87%. Customers up 100.58%. Items sold up 94.4%. 🚀

Every single metric doubled in four days.

And the after period is only four days, not seven. Meaning the daily average didn't just improve. It more than doubled on a shorter window. 🥵

This is what happens when the right changes get made at the right time. Not a new product launch. Not a viral moment. Not a sale or a promotion driving artificial volume.

A system that finally started working the way it was supposed to.

Most brands look at a week like the "before" and think it's fine. Steady orders. Consistent GMV. Nothing broken.

But fine isn't the ceiling. And the data proved it — four days later. 💪

When you know what levers to pull, the numbers move fast. 💸

08/28/2026

293,200 people watched coffee slowly drip through a Vietnamese phin filter. No talking. No hard sell. Just the sound of brewing and a caption that made people curious. ☕

"Vietnamese coconut coffee"

That's all it took. 😉

The creator didn't pitch a product. They shared a moment. A quiet Sunday morning ritual with a specific coffee origin tagged naturally in the caption. The kind of content that makes you stop scrolling because it looks exactly like something you'd want to be doing right now.

That's the difference between influencer content that converts and content that just gets skipped.

293.2k views for a specialty coffee brand through one creator, one aesthetic moment, one perfectly placed tag. 💯

No discount code. No "use my link for 10% off." Just genuine lifestyle content that made nearly 300,000 people think about their next cup of coffee and exactly where those beans came from.

The most effective product placement doesn't look like placement at all.

It looks like someone's real morning. And that's what we build. 🎯

08/27/2026

91% of people say honest negative reviews build creator trust. Let that one sit. 😉

Not highlights. Not best moments. The stuff that didn't work.

2,000 people across 16 countries were asked which content types actually make them trust a creator. Every single answer on this chart is above 80%.

Long-Form Content Depth — 94%. Go deep or go home.
Honest Negative Reviews — 91%. Admitting flaws builds more trust than hiding them.
Real Usage Demonstration — 89%. Show it working in real life, not in a studio.
Community Engagement — 85%. Creators who respond and interact earn more belief.
Multi-Year Track Record — 82%. Time is the ultimate proof of consistency.

Notice what's not on this list. 🤔

Viral moments. Aesthetic feeds. High production value. Sponsorship volume. Follower count.

None of it moves the trust needle the way depth and honesty do.

Audiences have gotten very good at spotting the difference between a creator performing credibility and one who actually has it. The bar has moved. Polish used to be enough. Now it's almost a red flag. 🫨

The creators brands should be investing in are the ones who've been showing up consistently, talking honestly about what works and what doesn't, and building a track record that speaks for itself.

Trust isn't built overnight. It's earned through consistency, honesty, and proof — and audiences can tell the difference every time. 👀

08/25/2026

87% of people trust YouTube creators for product information. No other platform comes close. 🧐

2,000 people across 16 countries were asked where they actually trust creators when it comes to products. The gap between first and second place is striking. 👇

YouTube — 87%
Reddit — 58%
Facebook — 52%
Instagram — 46%
TikTok — 39%
X — 29%

YouTube leads by 29 points. That's not a marginal difference. That's a completely different category of trust.

And it makes sense when you think about how people use each platform.

YouTube is where people go to learn. 10-minute reviews. Side-by-side comparisons. Honest tutorials. Unboxings that don't cut away when something goes wrong. The format rewards depth — and depth is what builds belief.

TikTok gets 35 hours of monthly attention but only 39% trust for product info. Instagram has 76% daily usage but only 46% product trust.

Time spent and trust are not the same thing. 💪

The brands that only show up where attention is highest are missing the platform where purchase decisions actually get made.

Teach something real. Go deep on the problem your product solves. Give value before you ask for the sale.

That's not a content strategy. That's how trust works. And YouTube is where it compounds fastest. 💡

08/24/2026

$103,550.52 in gross revenue. 1,110 orders. $13,768.37 spent. 7.52 ROI. 30 days. 🔥

A fashion client just crossed six figures on TikTok Shop in a single month. 💙

$12.40 cost per order across 1,110 purchases. That efficiency held for an entire month — not a lucky week, not a short burst. Thirty days of consistent, compounding returns.

Look at that chart. Two lines moving in near-perfect sync for 30 days straight. Cost and orders tracking together, day after day. That's what a mature, well-structured campaign looks like at scale.

This didn't happen overnight. 🎯

It started at $800 in spend with a 6.22 ROI. Then $3,500 the next period with a 7.65. Then $6,800 with a 7.66. Each time we scaled the budget, the efficiency held — because the foundation was built right from the beginning.

Now we're at $13,768 spent and $103,550 generated. 🥵

$13,768 invested. $103,550 back. In one month.

That's what scaling a TikTok Shop campaign the right way actually looks like — not a spike and a crash, but a system that gets stronger every time you add more to it. 💸

08/20/2026

£8,188.19 in affiliate GMV. 967 items sold. £1,165.49 in estimated commissions. And affiliates drove 95.86% of total seller GMV. 💸

One week. One affiliate system firing on all cylinders.

The number that tells the real story — shoppable video GMV up 307.35% versus the previous 7 days. Commissions up 375.89%. Items sold up 273.36%.

Everything accelerating at the same time. 🚀

The top video alone pulled in 437,200 views and generated £3,456.34 in direct revenue. One creator. One gut health video. One link in the bio that converted.

That's the affiliate effect. 🔥

No ad spend behind these numbers. Creators posting content about the product, audiences clicking through, and a TikTok Shop backend converting that trust into real transactions.

£8,161.99 of the total GMV came directly from shoppable video. Meaning the content itself was the storefront.

Most brands are still treating affiliates as a secondary channel — something to set up and forget. The ones running it as a primary growth engine are watching their GMV compound week after week without touching their ad budget.

Content that sells while you sleep. That's what a healthy affiliate program looks like. 🎯

08/19/2026

9.56 ROI. 53 orders. $1,639.50 in revenue. $171.45 spent. One week. 🔥

$3.23 cost per order on TikTok Shop. That number is almost hard to believe but there it is in the dashboard.

Look at the cost line on that chart. 👀 Flat and steady the entire week. Spend stayed consistent while orders fluctuated naturally day to day. That's a campaign running exactly the way it should — controlled spend, variable returns, overall efficiency that holds.

This is what early-stage GMV Max looks like when the setup is right. 🎯

Low spend. High ROI. Clean data coming in. The foundation is set.

Most brands see numbers like this and immediately want to 10x the budget overnight. The smarter move is to let the algorithm keep learning, tighten the product mix, and scale deliberately — so the 9.56 doesn't collapse under pressure.

$171.45 to generate $1,639.50.

The math works. Now we build on it. ⚡

08/17/2026

Follower count is not on this chart. Neither is production quality. Neither is posting frequency. 🙅

2,000 people across 16 countries were asked what actually builds creator trust. Here's what they said 👇

- Expertise — 95%. The single highest driver. People follow creators who genuinely know their subject.
- Transparency — 90%. Be open about what's paid, what's not, what works, what doesn't.
- Credibility — 82%. Consistent track record over time. Not one viral moment.
- Authenticity — 81%. Real opinions. Real experiences. Not a polished performance.
- Reliability — 74%. Show up consistently. Say what you mean. Mean what you say.
- Relatability — 62%. Lowest on the chart. Likability matters less than people think.

The brand playbook for influencer selection has been backwards for years. 🫣

Most brands chase reach, aesthetic, and relatability. The audience is actually optimizing for expertise and transparency — and they're getting better at spotting the difference between a creator who knows their craft and one who's just good at performing it.

Polish doesn't build trust. Proof does. 🎯

The creators who win long-term are the ones who teach something real, admit honest trade-offs, and show up the same way every time. That's not a content style. That's a standard.

Brands that match with those creators don't just get views. They inherit the trust those creators spent years building. 💡

Young With Solutions

09/04/2026

09/01/2026

08/31/2026

08/28/2026

08/27/2026

08/25/2026

08/24/2026

08/20/2026

08/19/2026

08/17/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request