06/01/2026
Now that both Minnesota's state DFL and GOP conventions are over, we are full steam ahead into the political campaign season. Let the mudslinging begin.
But must there be mud? Can we get through this season with less vitriol, less name-calling, less swear words, and more civility?
Call me crazy, but my hope is yes.
I get it. And so do you. Algorithms demand a lot these days. Being polite and civil gets way less clicks, way less engagement -- ultimately, less visibility. And candidates need visibility
Contentious, hateful campaigns, however, are nothing new (and well before social media).
The election of 1800 for president of the United States was one of the dirtiest campaigns in our nation's short history.
John Adams and Thomas Jefferson went for throats: Jefferson's campaign calling Adams a "hideous hermaphroditcal character;" that Adams was a "repulsive pedant," and a "gross hypocrite." For Adam's campaign, voters were warned that a Jefferson presidency would result in burning of Bibles and a total collapse of morality. One surrogate suggested that if Jefferson were to become president, "we would see our wives and daughters the victims of legal prostitution."
So, what can we do, the observers, the audience, the captive audience of this political season?
We can do our part. We can engage with the less inflammatory of those candidates, the ones who are working hard to stay positive, not trash on their opponent, and who draw distinctions on policy over person.
My dad once said to me that I was a person of "hope." That he could see that my heart was full of "hope" all the time, for so many things. Dad was right. I do have a tremendous amount of hope.
So, I'm putting my hope out there now. A call for civility. A call for debate on merits, debate on substance. Let's click, like, and heart on deep talk about hard issues.
We, the electorate, deserve that.